December 9, 2024
December 10, 2024
July 11, 2024
May 20, 2024
The bipartisan Senate AI Working Group Roadmap released last week rightfully acknowledges the far-reaching impact of AI on society and the need for a collaborative, multi-stakeholder and cross-disciplinary approach to policymaking and regulation. While still a high-level policy blueprint, the report covers important ground ranging from the level of annual investment needed for the U.S. to lead in the age of AI, to issues of safety, risk and impacts on workforce and key industries.
The task before the U.S. government is not a small one: Recognizing AI presents novel challenges and opportunities, lawmakers must find a way to create enforceable guardrails with essential protections while also staying flexible enough to accommodate future innovation. Similarly, there is recognition that private industry has an important role to play and must also work constructively and transparently to advance AI while guarding against its risks and unintended – and unwanted – consequences.
Knowing corporate affairs leaders will be tasked with translating any new AI-related risk and opportunity gleaned from the report into defined actions, Mission North has compiled the following considerations and recommendations.
Because there’s virtually no sector immune to AI’s impacts, it is essential for companies developing and deploying AI to effectively communicate AI’s role and value, and particularly how its use does not create real or perceived harm. This should be unmissable to key stakeholders. Of course, this is even more critical for sectors that continue to face scrutiny by Congress (and reinforced by the Working Group report). That includes housing, consumer finance, media/journalism and healthcare.
Consistent with Mission North’s own research, a key driver of public concern around AI is its potential to upend the workforce. Forty-seven percent of respondents to our survey indicated they saw AI creating a “more dangerous future” than “a better future.” Organizations of all kinds need to codify and communicate how they will ensure their employees can participate in an AI-enabled economy and workplace to avoid wide-scale disruption and displacement.
Living in the age of AI requires enormous amounts of energy at a time when industrialized economies are desperately seeking to decarbonize and keep electricity affordable. Some estimates indicate that by 2027, AI servers could use a country’s worth of power – between 85 to 134 terawatt hours (Twh) annually – similar to what Argentina, the Netherlands and Sweden each use in a year.
Large language models, or LLMs, are only as useful as the data they’ve consumed, and there’s concern we’re already running out of data to feed those models, making new data – of all kinds – more valuable.
Overall, big questions of data ownership, usage and copyright, and more, receive focus in the Senate’s blueprint, but remain generally unresolved.
While the Senate Working Group Blueprint is a helpful gauge on how the U.S. government is contemplating an AI future, it's incumbent upon companies and their leaders to undertake their own thoughtful planning and prioritize timely and transparent communication around AI with their most important audiences.
For additional reading, Mission North’s Co-CEO Bill Bourdon recently shared prescient advice on how companies can take a first principles approach to AI storytelling to minimize risk and maximize opportunity.
December 9, 2024
December 10, 2024
November 21, 2024
November 12, 2024
November 21, 2024
November 11, 2024